I am getting read to upgrade the KLR suspension, both front and rear.
For those that have experience with progressive springs, intiminators and emulators - which of the three do you prefer?
I'm a lighter rider at 165 lbs and plan to ride more dirt than street. The gnarlier and more technical the trail the better. Please hold your laughter - I know, that sounds a little ridiculous for the KLR, especially coming from novice rider.
Although the bike is on the heavier side, with a decent suspension set up and a skilled rider it seems plenty capable of keeping up with other dual sport guys.
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!!
Weigh yourself when you have on all your riding gear. This is the weight you really need to consider when setting up the forks. You might be surprised at how much all your gear weighs.
I started with the progressive springs in my 02 KLR. I just never really liked them off the pavement, especially if the road had ANY amount of wash boarding on it. I switched to RaceTech straight rate springs and they were MUCH better in all conditions. I did not mess with an emulator. I used slightly heavier than stock oil, but I can't remember the exact weight. Getting your preload spacers correct is also important for setting the front sag. I used PVC pipe because it was easy to cut. I don't recall the pipe size though, maybe 3/4" or 1".
On the rear, all I did was replace the stock spring with a 420 series spring.
Those two suspension upgrades made a big difference in how the bike handled. They set me back about $240-250 total.
When riding in the more technical stuff, I really liked having the 14 tooth front sprocket on the bike. Those extra bit of revs and the extra bit of chugging power really make a difference on steep climbs. I wish I had done this before heading to Colorado to ride all the passes around Ouray!!
Here are some ride reports where I used the KLR for pretty technical stuff:
Gnats, Knobbies, Bolts, Bullets and Boulders... The Thrashing of Best Laid Plans...
Cloudcroft New Mexico ride - Memorial Day Weekend 2010
The Great SW Colorado Mountain Pass Adventure of 2010 (Might want to skip to page two of the posts because the image links for most of page one are dead).
Those reports will give you a good idea of what my reference is for harder stuff, especially the first day or so of that Arizona trip and Imogene and Black Bear passes in Colorado. On the Colorado trip, the guys on the KLRs were working HARD and the KTM guys were CHEATING!
If you REALLY want to ride more technical gnarly stuff, I would not suggest trying to make the KLR what it isn't, a trail bike. Yes, it CAN be ridden in the really nasty stuff. I did it with mine. It was a LOT of work and I fell down a lot
Yes, I had fun. However, after getting a lighter bike with better suspension, more power, and better brakes, I realized just how hard I was having to work on the KLR when I got in the rough stuff. I still fall down, just not as often
The KLR is a great bike. There is a reason why it has been so popular with world travelers. Bang for the buck it is hard to beat. But I am a big believer in the right tool for the right job. If you really want to do the nasty stuff, keep the KLR and get a second bike for that stuff. Use the KLR for "Adventure" riding: paved stuff, forest roads, two track roads, and mild trails. Use the lighter bike for the rough stuff. It will be MUCH easier to learn good riding skills and habits and you will be MUCH less likely to get hurt. I speak from experience having started my DS riding on an 02 BMW R1150GS, then moving to an 02 KLR 650, and finally to a 2010 KTM 530 EXC and 2005/2007 BMW R1200GS. In the hard stuff, weight is THE enemy. It makes you expend energy in ways you don't even realize. As you use up your energy, mistakes become more common and the odds of getting hurt go up considerably.