One of my running buds is deputy in our rural county. I asked him about laws and liability for dog owners when their dogs are vicious and hurt people. His answer..."your on your own." OK...not a problem but this is going to put a lot of dogs in the ground. Seems like a cruel way to force responsibility on their owners.
It’s not that you’re on your own, it’s that everything is set up so that only
after the act happens can anything be done. State law can put the onus on the owner of a vicious dog to have a $100,000 liability policy and be required to restrain it.
Just take a guess what it takes for the dog to be labeled as such.
So if it’s going to take an attack (or something so close to an attack that it makes you think an attack is about to happen) from a dog, the likelihood that the dog is killed in the first place is substantially higher than the law being called.
Also, civil liability laws always apply, so you can being the owner to court for your costs at the hospital/doctor and, since prices are so high right now, for the bullet you had to use. Good luck squeezing blood from a stone with the owners though. I haven’t seen an aggressive dog from well-to-do types out in the country. It’s always from the shacks that will give you tetanus by looking at them.
Canines are predators and have good depth perception with binocular vision (like we have).
But they're not good at math and kinematics. Slowing down changes their intercept course and they can't compensate enough when you speed back up.
Interesting aside, there are several papers out there showing dogs (and maybe other animals, it’s been awhile since I’ve read them) can do calculus equations quite well. They have quite the knack for minimization of time.
That's the technique I was taught a very long time ago.
They can't spin on a dime and that will throw them.
They still teach it at the MSF basic rider’s course. No animal that a dog is ever going to be familiar with can accelerate like we do, so it gets them.