I am not sure if the comparison with a Street Twin is fair. That's a 900 cc with much more torque. If Triumph would put 17" wheels, it would be a no brainer even over this little Kawi. But no, it's gotta be an 18" wheel. Ay chihuahua.
I am not sure if the comparison with a Street Twin is fair. That's a 900 cc with much more torque. If Triumph would put 17" wheels, it would be a no brainer even over this little Kawi. But no, it's gotta be an 18" wheel. Ay chihuahua.
Why is it not a fair comparison to the Trident? Same price range, same weight... The only difference is that the Kawi is down on power and has less features than the Triumph.2022 Kawasaki Z650RS First Look
The new 2022 Kawasaki Z650RS is based on the Z650 but withwww.motorcycle.com
Good story here, they think it's definitely coming to USA. Couple of errors and contradictions... Hope it comes with the tall seat pictured for the USA.
I don't think it's fair to compare it with a triumph Trident, that's a normal modern naked bike with a triple. But the XSR700 is a clear competitor. For me personally the biggest competitor is Ducati scrambler.
Why is it not a fair comparison to the Trident? Same price range, same weight... The only difference is that the Kawi is down on power and has less features than the Triumph.
I think the Trident is a neo retro just like the Z650RS. It's been called a neo retro in several articles. Below are just a few links:What I meant is, the Triumph is not a retro-styled bike. I think it competes with the normal Z650 more directly. Triumph doesn't make a retro-looks modern bike. Triumph Trident is aimed squarely at the likes SV650, MT-07. Kawasaki doesn't really have a dog in that fight.
That's just MHO. I don't think a lot of people will cross-shop a Triumph Trident against a Z650RS. I agree with you that the price/performance is in favor of the Triumph, but I just don't think they are the same class of bike. I think if you invite the Triumph Trident, you have to compare the MT-07, SV650, CB650R, other "naked sport" street bikes.
I agree that the Z900 SE is a much better value.Z900 SE is a far better buy, with those upgraded components. Ohlins rear shock. Brembo calipers with S.S. lines. Now if they would do a Ninja 900 SX sport touring version, I'd jump in that in a heartbeat.
Z900RS SE is priced at $13,449, compared to Z900 SE at $10,699. Exactly the same components, so Kawi apparently believes retro styling is somehow worth $2750 more. I don't see the value in that but the Z900 RS sold quite well, so evidently lots of riders are willing to pay more for retro styling.I agree that the Z900 SE is a much better value.
I can't believe Kawasaki prices the Z650RS that high.