Should we break up such large/recurring threads into annual or legislative-session archive segments?
I think so.
Should we break up such large/recurring threads into annual or legislative-session archive segments?
What, first lane splitting, now thread splitting?
Lets catch it next time around. I'll lock this thread after this session and we can start clean in two years...if it doesn't pass this time.
What, first lane splitting, now thread splitting?
Lets catch it next time around. I'll lock this thread after this session and we can start clean in two years...if it doesn't pass this time.
http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=82R&Bill=HB1571
This is the same comittee that the bill was left to rot with last time...
you may note, it was referred to them on March 3rd.
If passed you wont catch me doing it in Houston unless there is some kind of massive marketing campaign about it. Without properly educating the population people wont tolerate it and I believe will intentionally try to prevent it.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
So if made a legal option, you will not take advantage of it, because your afraid others may not like it?
Hmm No. People would be realistically concerned that without an effort by the State to inform people of the change some commuters would take actions to prevent lane splitting that would endanger riders and are adult enough to think the extra risk may not be worth the bother. Personally I can see both sides.
So if made a legal option, you will not take advantage of it, because your afraid others may not like it?
Hmm, ok,, I can accept your position on it's face at the same time disagree with it and my opinions.
Many folks disagree with you riding a motorcycle, as you are a potential funding disaster to the city and state coffers. Same with my ownership of a gun, someone else's drinking of alcohol in there home, another's black skin, belief in a god at all, or other then the one they do.
Even though all those things are protected by law, or higher principles..... some will disagree, even to the point, they physically try and stop others.. to those that do, I say, give it your best shot, but you will not be unopposed. That is not bravado, that is simply who I am, what I was raised to think, and what I have spent a career believing.
Hmm No. People would be realistically concerned that without an effort by the State to inform people of the change some commuters would take actions to prevent lane splitting that would endanger riders and are adult enough to think the extra risk may not be worth the bother. Personally I can see both sides.
If that is a way a person feels on the topic, I support them in there personal opinion..and decision to not do something legal, and morel, because others may not like it or it exceeds there own personal comfort and security level.. That last part makes sense to me completely.. to not ride a street bike, jump from an airplane, ride a dirt bike or even ride a horse, simply because it is an activity with risks that are beyond what the individual is willing to risk.. I get that... and would never have hard feelings about it.
It's the part about not doing something legal, morel and otherwise ethical just because some insane person out there MIGHT get mad at me for choosing to do something IAW the current law.... That I don't get.
Wanting "State to inform people of the change" sounds alot like a A: waste of time, it has failed thus far with "Look for Motorcycles" "Don't drink and drive" "dont text and drive" "only use hands free cell phones" B: worth a shot to toss up some bill boards and radio ads.. but Im not holding my breath that it will make a difference.
If I mis understood the above posts and they are just the personal security risk kind of thing, my apologies... And well.. I don't live in Huston... Perhaps you all have so many insane people there .... it really is a risk to live, ride, lane share
bones...I disagree with your innuendo and attempted slight with the adult comment... But will say, it cuts both ways.
It's interesting to me that car drivers get all foamy at the mouth when you talk about lane splitting on the motorcycle, but then the same car drivers don't see anything wrong with "sharing" a lane with bicyclists when they blow by at 50 mph 16 inches from their handlebars...
It's interesting to me that car drivers get all foamy at the mouth when you talk about lane splitting on the motorcycle, but then the same car drivers don't see anything wrong with "sharing" a lane with bicyclists when they blow by at 50 mph 16 inches from their handlebars...
I will definitely be splitting lanes when I am confident that most people in the state are familiar with the law. Until then i have been getting around just fine without such a law for the last 23 years. If I were visiting LA I would not be worried. Cagers there is very familiar with lane splitting.